PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 3207: Manhattan Project Sites Study Act of 2004

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 3207: Manhattan Project Sites Study Act of 2004

108th Congress · introduced 2003-09-30 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 462.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2003-09-30 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Hastings, Doc [R-WA-4] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
  4. Where it stands now: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 462. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Manhattan Project Sites Study Act of 2004

Plain summary

Manhattan Project Sites Study Act of 2004 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of the Manhattan Project sites at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, the Hanford Site in the State of Washington, and the Oak Ridge Laboratory in Tennessee (Project sites), to assess the national significance, suitability, and feasibility of designating such sites as a unit of the National Park System. Requires the Secretary, in conducting the study, to: (1) consult with interested government officials, representatives of organizations, and members of the public; (2) evaluate, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy, the compatibility of designating a Project site with maintaining the specified goals of the Department of Energy (DOE) and public health and safety; and (3) consider existing DOE research on the Project sites. Requires the Secretary to report to Congress on such study.

Congressional Research Service summary (Reported to House with amendment(s)), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Manhattan Project Sites Study Act of 2004

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Reported to House with amendment(s))

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Hastings, Doc [R-WA-4] · 1 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 3207, Manhattan Project Sites Park Study Act of 2004 (2004-09-20); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 3207, Manhattan Project Sites Park Study Act of 2004 (2004-09-20)

Cosponsors on this site

No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong108-hr3207 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong108 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong108