H.R. 4913: Union Chapel Fossil Footprint Site Preservation Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 4913: Union Chapel Fossil Footprint Site Preservation Act
108th Congress · introduced 2004-07-22 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Executive Comment Requested from Interior.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2004-07-22 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Executive Comment Requested from Interior. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Union Chapel Fossil Footprint Site Preservation Act
Plain summary
Union Chapel Fossil Footprint Site Preservation Act - Authorizes appropriations to the Secretary of the Interior to: (1) preserve and protect the paleontological resources located within the exterior boundaries of the former Union Chapel Mine site (Alabama); (2) provide opportunities for scientific research in a manner compatible with preservation and protection of such resources; and (3) provide the public with opportunities for educational activities in a manner compatible with such preservation and protection.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Union Chapel Fossil Footprint Site Preservation Act
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4] · 0 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4] reported raising $1.2 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-108hr4913.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/108/hr>
Record fed-us-cong108-hr4913 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong108 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong108