S. 1003: A bill to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River.
Before you vote › Federal bills
S. 1003: A bill to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River.
108th Congress · introduced 2003-05-06 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 407.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2003-05-06 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 407. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
A bill to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River.
Plain summary
Amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to provide that the established use and occupancy of lands and maintenance or replacement of facilities and structures for commercial recreation services at Stub Creek on the Salmon River in Idaho shall continue to be authorized, subject to such reasonable regulation as the Secretary of Agriculture deems appropriate, including rules that would provide for termination for non-compliance and, if terminated, reoffering the site through a competitive process.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in Senate), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
A bill to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River.
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in Senate)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID] · 1 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: S. 1003, A bill to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River (2003-08-01); CBO cost estimate: S. 1003, A bill to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River (2003-08-01); CBO cost estimate: S. 1003, An act to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River (2004-07-28); CBO cost estimate: S. 1003, An act to clarify the intent of Congress with respect to the continued use of established commercial outfitter hunting camps on the Salmon River (2004-07-28)
Cosponsors on this site
Mike Crapo (R-ID)
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (4)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
- Authorization
- A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
- Bill
- A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).
- Rulemaking
- The process agencies use to write regulations that carry out laws passed by Congress or a legislature. Usually an agency publishes a proposed rule, takes public comments, then publishes a final rule.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in Senate)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-108s1003.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/108/s>
Record fed-us-cong108-s1003 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong108 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong108