S. 678: Postmasters Equity Act of 2003
Before you vote › Federal bills
S. 678: Postmasters Equity Act of 2003
108th Congress · introduced 2003-03-20 · Government Operations and Politics · Latest: Became Public Law No: 108-86.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2003-03-20 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Akaka, Daniel K. [D-HI] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 505 (2003): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, S678 (2003-09-16), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 108-86. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Postmasters Equity Act of 2003
Plain summary
Postmaster Equity Act of 2003 - Amends Federal law to declare that the Postal Service's employment policy shall provide for compensation, working conditions, and career opportunities that will assure the attraction and attention of qualified and capable postmaster personnel. Grants postmaster organizations the right to participate in program planning and development pertaining to pay policies, schedules, and fringe benefits and other postmaster programs. Authorizes, under specified conditions, a postmasters organization to request the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) to convene a fact-finding panel if the organization disagrees with the decision of the Service's proposal to change pay policies, schedules, and fringe benefit programs affecting postmasters that shall be in effect during the period covered by a collective bargaining agreement between the Service and certain recognized bargaining representatives. Prescribes guidelines for establishing the panel. Requires the panel to recommend standards for pay policies and schedules and fringe benefit programs affecting the members of the postmasters organizations for the period covered by the collective bargaining agreement and, consistent with such standards, make appropriate recommendations concerning the differences between the parties on such policies, schedules, and programs within 30 days after its appointment, unless the Service and the postmasters organization agree to a longer period. Authorizes the Service or the postmasters organization, three years after enactment of this Act, to request FMCS and the other party to create a panel to review the effectiveness of the procedures and other provisions of this Act and the Postal Service's employment policy.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in Senate), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Postmasters Equity Act of 2003
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in Senate)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Akaka, Daniel K. [D-HI] · 39 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: S. 678, Postmasters Equity Act of 2003 (2003-06-24); CBO cost estimate: S. 678, Postmasters Equity Act of 2003 (2003-06-24)
Cosponsors on this site
Susan M. Collins (R-ME), Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Patty Murray (D-WA), Mike Crapo (R-ID)
Recorded votes
- House roll call 505 (2003): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, S678 (2003-09-16): Passed
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in Senate)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-108s678.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/108/s>
Record fed-us-cong108-s678 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong108 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong108