S.J.Res. 28: A joint resolution recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy during World War II.
Before you vote › Federal bills
S.J.Res. 28: A joint resolution recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy during World War II.
108th Congress · introduced 2004-02-25 · Commemorations · Latest: Became Public Law No: 108-236.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2004-02-25 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [R-CO] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 220 (2004): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, SJRES28 (2004-06-02), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 108-236. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
A joint resolution recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy during World War II.
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Recognizes the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy, France, during World War II on June 6, 1944.
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
A joint resolution recognizing the 60th anniversary of the Allied landing at Normandy during World War II.
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Campbell, Ben Nighthorse [R-CO] · 69 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Susan M. Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), Patty Murray (D-WA), Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and 9 more.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 220 (2004): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, SJRES28 (2004-06-02): Passed
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Joint resolution
- In Texas, the type of measure the Legislature uses to propose a constitutional amendment (marked HJR or SJR). The governor does not sign or veto it; the voters decide. In Congress a joint resolution can also be used like a bill. In Florida, a joint resolution passed by three-fifths of the members of each chamber puts a constitutional amendment on the ballot.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-108sjres28.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/108/sjres>
Record fed-us-cong108-sjres28 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong108 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong108