PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.J.Res. 88: Marriage Protection Amendment

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.J.Res. 88: Marriage Protection Amendment

109th Congress · introduced 2006-06-06 · Families · Latest: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2006-06-06 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R-CO-4] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 378 (2006): On Passage, HJRES88 (2006-07-18), Failed. See all
  4. Where it stands now: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Marriage Protection Amendment

Plain summary

Constitutional Amendment - Marriage Protection Amendment - Declares that: (1) marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman; and (2) neither the U.S. Constitution nor the constitution of any state shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon any other union.

Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Marriage Protection Amendment

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Musgrave, Marilyn N. [R-CO-4] · 134 cosponsors

Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.

Cosponsors on this site

Robert B. Aderholt (R-AL), Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. (D-GA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), John Boozman (R-AR), John R. Carter (R-TX), Tom Cole (R-OK), Virginia Foxx (R-NC), Frank D. Lucas (R-OK) and 74 more.

Recorded votes

Words on this page, explained (1)
Constitutional amendment
A change to a constitution. In Texas the Legislature proposes an amendment with a joint resolution passed by two-thirds of the members of each chamber. It takes effect only if a majority of the people voting on it approve it. In Florida, an amendment needs at least 60% of the votes cast on it to pass.

Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong109-hjres88 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109