H.R. 1132: National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 1132: National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005
109th Congress · introduced 2005-03-03 · Health · Latest: Became Public Law No: 109-60.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2005-03-03 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Whitfield, Ed [R-KY-1] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 109-60. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on July 27, 2005. The summary of that version is repeated here.) National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005 - (Sec. 3) Amends the Public Health Service Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to establish a controlled substance monitoring program in each state or to improve existing state programs. Sets forth a formula for determining grant amounts, which includes a ratio of pharmacies in a state to the number of pharmacies in all states. Requires the Secretary to establish minimum requirements for criteria to be used by states for information security, uniform electronic formats for reporting information, database access and accuracy, and the use and disclosure of information. Requires a state to submit a grant application that includes: (1) an agreement to adopt health information interoperability standards; (2) penalties for the unauthorized use and disclosure of information; (3) information that demonstrates that the state has enacted legislation or regulations permitting the implementation of such a monitoring program and the imposition of penalties; and (4) a description of the manner by which interoperability will be achieved with a program in a bordering state. Provides for the return of grant funds if a state ceases implementation or improvement of its program. Requires an approved state to: (1) require a dispenser to report within one week of each dispensing of a controlled substance to an ultimate user; (2) report information in an electronic format specified by the Secretary; (3) establish and maintain a searchable electronic database; and (4) take security measures to protect database integrity. Allows the Secretary to make certain exceptions to the reporting requirements. Allows a state to disclose information from the database and summary statistics in response to certain requests by: (1) medical practitioners; (2) law enforcement, narcotics control, licensure, disciplinary, or program authorities; (3) the controlled substance monitoring program of another state; and (4) agents of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), state Medicaid programs, state health departments, or the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Requires an approved state to establish a program to notify practitioners and dispensers of information that will help identify and prevent the unlawful diversion or misuse of controlled substances. Allows a state to notify the appropriate authorities if information in the database indicates such diversion or abuse. Directs the Secretary to specify a uniform electronic format for the reporting, sharing, and disclosure of information. Requires the Secretary to: (1) determine whether the implementation of such monitoring programs has had a substantial negative impact on patient access to treatment or enrollment in research or clinical trials; and (2) identify additional appropriate categories of exclusion from reporting to the extent that there has been such a negative impact. Directs the Secretary to study and report to Congress on such monitoring programs, including: (1) state progress in implementing such programs; (2) the effect of such programs on inappropriate use, abuse, or diversion of controlled substances or on access to appropriate pain care; (3) interoperability of state programs; (4) the feasibility of implementing a real-time electronic controlled substance monitoring program; (5) privacy protections for program information; (6) the feasibility of implementing technological alternatives to centralized data storage; and (7) state penalties for unauthorized use and disclosure of program information. Requires the Secretary to give preference to approved states in awarding any competitive grants related to drug abuse. Allows a state to establish an advisory council to assist in the establishment, implementation, or improvement of such a monitoring program. Authorizes appropriations.
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Whitfield, Ed [R-KY-1] · 34 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1132, National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005 (2005-07-26); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1132, National All Schedules Prescription Electronic Reporting Act of 2005 (2005-07-26)
Cosponsors on this site
Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Rosa L. DeLauro (D-CT)
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (3)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
- Rulemaking
- The process agencies use to write regulations that carry out laws passed by Congress or a legislature. Usually an agency publishes a proposed rule, takes public comments, then publishes a final rule.
- Securities
- Financial investments that can be bought and sold, such as stocks and bonds.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-109hr1132.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/109/hr>
Record fed-us-cong109-hr1132 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109