PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 1728: Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 1728: Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005

109th Congress · introduced 2005-04-20 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Became Public Law No: 109-319.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2005-04-20 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Carnahan, Russ [D-MO-3] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
  4. Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 109-319. (final step reached)
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005

Plain summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on February 28, 2006. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to study and report to specified congressional committees on the suitability and feasibility of designating an area comprising Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri, which includes the Bequette-Ribault, St. Gemme-Amoureaux, and Wilhauk homes and the related and supporting historical assets located in the County, as a unit of the National Park System. Requires the study to include the potential impact that designation of such Area as a national heritage area is likely to have on land within the proposed area or bordering the proposed area that is privately owned at the time that such study is conducted.

Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Carnahan, Russ [D-MO-3] · 1 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1728, French Colonial Heritage National Historic Site Study Act of 2005 (2005-11-22); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1728, French Colonial Heritage National Historic Site Study Act of 2005 (2005-11-22); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1728, Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005 (2006-03-10); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1728, Ste. Genevieve County National Historic Site Study Act of 2005 (2006-03-10)

Cosponsors on this site

No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong109-hr1728 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109