H.R. 310: Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 310: Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005
109th Congress · introduced 2005-01-25 · Science, Technology, Communications · Latest: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 17.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2005-01-25 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Upton, Fred [R-MI-6] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 35 (2005): On Passage, HR310 (2005-02-16), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 17. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005
Plain summary
Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 - (Sec. 2) Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that if the violator of the terms and conditions of any Federal Communications Commission (FCC) license, permit, or certificate is either a broadcast station licensee or permittee or an applicant for a broadcast license, permit, or certificate, and such violator is determined by the FCC to have broadcast obscene, indecent, or profane material, the amount of forfeiture penalty shall not exceed $500,000 for each violation. (Sec. 3) Directs the FCC, in enforcing penalties for violators, to take into account specified factors with respect to the violator's: (1) degree of culpability, including whether the offending material was live or recorded and scripted or unscripted; and (2) ability to pay, including whether the violator is a company or individual and the company's size and the financial impact that a penalty would have on an individual. Provides an enforcement exception, under certain circumstances, for a licensee or permittee not owned or controlled by the network organization providing the offending material to the licensee or permittee for broadcast. (Sec. 4) Makes the prohibition on penalties against nonlicensees inapplicable in the case of a person who utters obscene, indecent, or profane material broadcast by a licensee or permittee if such person willfully or intentionally makes the utterance. (Sec. 5) Provides deadlines for actions on complaints of violations of this Act. (Sec. 6) Authorizes the FCC, in addition to such penalties, to require the offending licensee or permittee to broadcast public service announcements that serve the educational and informational needs of children and reaches an audience of up to five times the audience estimated to have been reached by the obscene, indecent, or profane material. (Sec. 7) Directs the FCC, in any subsequent proceeding against a broadcast licensee or permittee who has already paid a fine for violating the provisions of this Act or when a court has ordered payment of a penalty and such order has become final, to: (1) consider whether the broadcast of such material demonstrates a lack of character or other qualifications required to operate a station; and (2) treat such violation as a serious violation with respect to the determination of license or permit renewal. (Sec. 9) Requires that if the FCC has issued a notice of violation in each of three or more proceedings during the term of the broadcast license and in each proceeding the fine was paid or a court has ordered payment of a penalty and such order has become final, then the FCC shall commence a proceeding to consider revocation of that station's license or permit. (Sec. 10) Requires annual FCC reports to Congress to include information with respect to violations of this Act and related proceedings. (Sec. 11) Directs the FCC, within nine months after the enactment of this Act and at least every three years thereafter, to revise the FCC policy statement to provide industry guidance on FCC interpretation of, and enforcement policies regarding, the laws and regulations concerning broadcast indecency. (Sec. 12) Requires the Government Accountability Office to study and report to specified congressional committees on the complaints made to the FCC concerning the broadcasting of obscene, indecent, and profane material. (Sec. 13) Expresses the sense of Congress that the broadcast television station licensees should reinstitute a family viewing policy for broadcasters that is similar to the policy that existed in the United States from 1975 to 1983.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Upton, Fred [R-MI-6] · 67 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 310, Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 (2005-02-14); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 310, Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 (2005-02-14)
Cosponsors on this site
Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Roger F. Wicker (R-MS), John Boozman (R-AR), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Michael R. Turner (R-OH) and 7 more.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 35 (2005): On Passage, HR310 (2005-02-16): Passed
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Rulemaking
- The process agencies use to write regulations that carry out laws passed by Congress or a legislature. Usually an agency publishes a proposed rule, takes public comments, then publishes a final rule.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-109hr310.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/109/hr>
Record fed-us-cong109-hr310 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109