PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 4376: Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts Act of 2006

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 4376: Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts Act of 2006

109th Congress · introduced 2005-11-17 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2005-11-17 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Neal, Richard E. [D-MA-2] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
  4. Where it stands now: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts Act of 2006

Plain summary

Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts Act of 2006 - Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park Service, to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on behalf of Springfield Technical Community College to provide financial assistance to such College for the purpose of maintaining, preserving, renovating, and rehabilitating any historic structures within the Springfield Armory National Historic Site, including historic structures within the Preservation Control Area. Limits the federal share of the cost of activities carried out using any assistance or grant under this Act to 50%.

Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts Act of 2006

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Neal, Richard E. [D-MA-2] · 0 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 4376, Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts, Act of 2005 (2006-07-10); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 4376, Springfield Armory National Historic Site, Massachusetts, Act of 2005 (2006-07-10)

Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Neal, Richard E. [D-MA-2] reported raising $3.1 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.

No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong109-hr4376 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109