PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 4709: Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 4709: Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006

109th Congress · introduced 2006-02-08 · Crime and Law Enforcement · Latest: Became Public Law No: 109-476.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2006-02-08 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 101 (2006): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, HR4709 (2006-04-25), Passed. See all
  4. Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 109-476. (final step reached)
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006

Plain summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on April 25, 2006. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006 - Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit the obtaining, in interstate or foreign commerce, of confidential phone records information from a telecommunications carrier or IP-enabled voice service provider (covered entity) by: (1) making false or fraudulent statements to an employee of a covered entity or to a customer of a covered entity; (2) providing false or fraudulent documents to a covered entity; or (3) accessing customer accounts of a covered entity through the Internet or by fraudulent computer-related activities without prior authorization. Imposes a fine and/or imprisonment of up to 10 years. Prohibits the unauthorized sale or transfer, in interstate or foreign commerce, of confidential phone records information by any person or the purchase or receipt of such information with knowledge that it was fraudulently obtained or obtained without prior authorization. Imposes a fine and/or imprisonment of up to 10 years. Exempts covered entities from such restrictions to the extent authorized by the Communications Act of 1934 (e.g., for billing, protection of property rights, or for emergency purposes). Doubles fines and imposes an additional five-year prison term for violations occurring in a 12-month period involving more than $100,000 or more than 50 customers of a covered entity. Imposes an additional five-year prison term for violations involving the use of confidential phone records information to commit crimes of violence, crimes of domestic violence, and crimes against law enforcement officials and the administration of justice. Grants extraterritorial jurisdiction over crimes defined by this Act. Exempts lawfully authorized federal or state investigative, protective, or intelligence activities from the prohibitions of this Act. Directs the U.S. Sentencing Commission to review and amend, if appropriate, federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements for crimes defined by this Act.

Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Smith, Lamar [R-TX-21] · 16 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 4709, Law Enforcement and Phone Privacy Protection Act of 2006 (2006-03-09); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 4709, Law Enforcement and Phone Privacy Protection Act of 2006 (2006-03-09)

Cosponsors on this site

Robert C. "Bobby" Scott (D-VA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Ed Case (D-HI)

Recorded votes

Words on this page, explained (3)
Appropriation
Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
Authorization
A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
Jurisdiction
The area or the matters a government or court has authority over.

Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong109-hr4709 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109