H.R. 5299: Fort McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Revision Act of 2006
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 5299: Fort McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Revision Act of 2006
109th Congress · introduced 2006-05-04 · Native Americans · Latest: Subcommittee Hearings Held.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2006-05-04 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Hayworth, J. D. [R-AZ-5] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Subcommittee Hearings Held. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Fort McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Revision Act of 2006
Plain summary
Fort McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Revision Act of 2006 - Cancels the obligation of the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation to repay the loan, under the Fort McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 1990, for the construction of water conveyance and delivery facilities on the Fort McDowell Indian Reservation.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Fort McDowell Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Revision Act of 2006
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Hayworth, J. D. [R-AZ-5] · 1 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Obligation
- A binding promise by a government agency to pay money, for example by signing a contract or awarding a grant. Spending data such as USAspending.gov counts money when it is obligated, which can be before it is actually paid out.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-109hr5299.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/109/hr>
Record fed-us-cong109-hr5299 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109