PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 787: To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, California, as the "Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse".

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 787: To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, California, as the "Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse".

109th Congress · introduced 2005-02-10 · Commemorations · Latest: Became Public Law No: 109-10.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2005-02-10 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-1] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 99 (2005): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, HR787 (2005-04-13), Passed. See all
  4. Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 109-10. (final step reached)
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, California, as the "Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse".

Plain summary

( (This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Designates the U.S. courthouse at 501 I Street in Sacramento, California, as the "Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse."

Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, California, as the "Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse".

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-1] · 39 cosponsors

Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.

Cosponsors on this site

Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA), Ken Calvert (R-CA)

Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-1] reported raising $5.5 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.

Recorded votes

Sources

Record fed-us-cong109-hr787 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109