S. 2068: A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Before you vote › Federal bills
S. 2068: A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
109th Congress · introduced 2005-11-18 · Law · Latest: Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2005-11-18 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Amends the District of Columbia Code to increase from 58 to 61 the number of associate judges on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate without amendment), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate without amendment)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME] · 3 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: S. 2068, A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (2006-06-16); CBO cost estimate: S. 2068, A bill to preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (2006-06-16)
Cosponsors on this site
Sponsor's campaign money: Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME] reported raising $22.5 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Bill
- A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate without amendment)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-109s2068.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/109/s>
Record fed-us-cong109-s2068 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109