PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

S. 3546: Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act

Before you vote › Federal bills

S. 3546: Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act

109th Congress · introduced 2006-06-21 · Health · Latest: Became Public Law No: 109-462.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2006-06-21 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 543 (2006): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, S3546 (2006-12-09), Passed. See all
  4. Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 109-462. (final step reached)
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act

Plain summary

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on September 5, 2006. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act - (Sec. 2) Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require a manufacturer, packer, or distributor whose name appears on the label of a nonprescription drug or dietary supplement marketed in the United States to: (1) submit to the Secretary of Health and Human Services within 15 business days any report of a serious adverse event associated with use of such drug or supplement in the United States; (2) submit within 15 business days any related medical information that is received within one year of the initial report; (3) maintain records related to each report for six years; and (4) permit inspection of such records. Allows a retailer whose name appears on the label as a distributor to authorize the manufacturer or packer to submit the required reports so long as the retailer directs all reported adverse events to such manufacturer or packer. Requires the Secretary to develop systems to ensure that duplicate reports of a serious adverse event are consolidated. Allows the Secretary to establish an exemption from such reporting that would have no adverse effect on public health. Considers a serious adverse event report to be: (1) a safety report that may be accompanied by a statement, which shall be included in any public disclosure of the report, that denies that the report or the records constitute an admission that the product involved caused or contributed to the adverse event; and (2) a record about an individual and a medical or similar file the disclosure of which violates the Freedom of Information Act unless all personally identifiable information is redacted. Provides that the submission of any adverse event report shall not be construed as an admission that the drug or supplement involved caused or contributed to the adverse event. Prohibits any state or local government from establishing or continuing any requirements related to a mandatory system for adverse event reports for nonprescription drugs or dietary supplements that are not identical to the requirements of this Act. Prohibits the responsible person from: (1) refusing to permit access to any required record; or (2) failing to establish or maintain any record, or make any report, required under this Act. Deems a nonprescription drug or dietary supplement that is marketed in the United States to be misbranded unless its label includes a domestic address or phone number for the reporting of a serious adverse event. (Sec. 4) Prohibits the falsification of a serious adverse event report. (Sec. 5) Prohibits the importation of a drug or supplement subject to this Act if the Secretary has credible information indicating that the responsible person has not complied with the requirements of this Act or has not allowed access to its records.

Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · 5 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: S. 3546, Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug and Consumer Protection Act (2006-09-12); CBO cost estimate: S. 3546, Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug and Consumer Protection Act (2006-09-12); CBO cost estimate: S. 3546, Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act (2006-12-27); CBO cost estimate: S. 3546, Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act (2006-12-27)

Cosponsors on this site

Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), John Cornyn (R-TX)

Recorded votes

Words on this page, explained (2)
Authorization
A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
Exemption
A rule that removes certain people, property or activities from a tax or requirement.

Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong109-s3546 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109