S. 397: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
S. 397: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
109th Congress · introduced 2005-02-16 · Law · Latest: Became Public Law No: 109-92.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2005-02-16 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 10 recorded votes in our records. Latest: House roll call 534 (2005): On Passage, S397 (2005-10-20), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 109-92. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on July 29, 2005. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act - (Sec. 3) Prohibits a qualified civil liability action from being brought in any state or federal court against a manufacturer or seller of a firearm, ammunition, or a component of a firearm that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, or against a trade association of such manufacturers or sellers, for damages, punitive damages, injunctive or declaratory relief, abatement, restitution, fines, penalties, or other relief resulting from the criminal or unlawful misuse of a firearm. Requires pending actions to be dismissed. Excludes from such prohibition actions: (1) brought by a directly harmed party against a person who transfers a firearm knowing that it will be used to commit a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime; (2) brought against a seller for negligent entrustment or negligence per se; (3) in which a manufacturer or seller of a firearm knowingly violated a state or federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the firearm and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought; (4) for breach of contract or warranty in connection with the purchase of the firearm; (5) for death, physical injuries, or property damage resulting directly from a defect in design or manufacture of the firearm when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable manner, except that where the discharge was caused by a volitional act that constituted a criminal offense, such act shall be considered the sole proximate cause of any resulting death, personal injuries, or property damage; or (6) commenced by the Attorney General to enforce firearms provisions under the federal criminal code or the Internal Revenue Code. Permits a person under age 17 to recover damages authorized under federal or state law in a civil action that meets specified requirements. (Sec. 5) Child Safety Lock Act of 2005 - Prohibits the sale, delivery, or transfer by a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer of a handgun to any person other than a person with a firearms license unless the transferee is provided with a secure gun storage or safety device. Lists exceptions, including for U.S. and state agencies and for law enforcement. Grants immunity from a qualified civil liability action for a person who has lawful possession and control of a handgun and who uses a secure gun storage or safety device. Establishes as penalties for violations: (1) license revocation or suspension for up to six months; or (2) a civil penalty of up to $2,500. (Sec. 6) Sets penalties for using or carrying armor piercing ammunition during and in relation to a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime, and for possessing armor piercing ammunition in furtherance of any such crime, that shall be in addition to the punishment otherwise provided for such crime. Directs the Attorney General to conduct and report to the chairman and ranking member of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees on a study to determine whether a uniform standard for the testing of projectiles against body armor is feasible.
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID] · 61 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Susan M. Collins (R-ME), John Cornyn (R-TX), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), John Thune (R-SD), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and 1 more.
Recorded votes
- Senate vote 206 (2005): On the Cloture Motion, S397 (2005-07-26): Cloture Motion Agreed to
- Senate vote 207 (2005): On the Amendment, S397 (2005-07-28): Amendment Agreed to
- Senate vote 208 (2005): On the Motion to Table, S397 (2005-07-28): Motion to Table Agreed to
- Senate vote 214 (2005): On the Amendment, S397 (2005-07-29): Amendment Agreed to
- Senate vote 215 (2005): On the Amendment, S397 (2005-07-29): Amendment Rejected
- Senate vote 216 (2005): On the Amendment, S397 (2005-07-29): Amendment Agreed to
- Senate vote 217 (2005): On the Amendment, S397 (2005-07-29): Amendment Rejected
- Senate vote 218 (2005): On the Amendment, S397 (2005-07-29): Amendment Rejected
- Senate vote 219 (2005): On Passage of the Bill, S397 (2005-07-29): Bill Passed
- House roll call 534 (2005): On Passage, S397 (2005-10-20): Passed
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Authorization
- A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
- Statute
- A written law passed by a legislature. A statute can be changed by a later law; changing a constitution needs an amendment.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-109s397.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/109/s>
Record fed-us-cong109-s397 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong109 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong109