H.R. 1575: Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 1575: Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act
110th Congress · introduced 2007-03-19 · Native Americans · Latest: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 512.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2007-03-19 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Stupak, Bart [D-MI-1] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 512. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act
Plain summary
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act - Reaffirms federal recognition and the rights and privileges of the Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians in Cheboygan County, Michigan. Extends to the Band eligibility for all federal services and benefits available to other federally recognized Indian tribes. Designates the service area for the delivery of federal services to the Band and to other Indians in the area of Cheboygan County, Michigan. Directs the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land in Cheboygan County, Michigan, and in other geographic areas and to hold such lands in trust for the benefit of the Band. Sets forth criteria and evidentiary requirements for determining the initial membership of the Band. Requires the Band to provide a copy of its base roll to the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs within one year after the enactment of this Act. Provides that the initial constitution of the Band shall be the constitution submitted by the Band to the Office of Federal Acknowledgment on May 2, 2005.
Congressional Research Service summary (Reported to House with amendment(s)), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Reported to House with amendment(s))
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Stupak, Bart [D-MI-1] · 1 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1575, Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act (2008-05-01); CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1575, Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians Reaffirmation Act (2008-05-01)
Cosponsors on this site
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Reported to House with amendment(s))
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-110hr1575.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/110/hr>
Record fed-us-cong110-hr1575 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong110 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong110