PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.Res. 1099: Recognizing the 65th anniversary of the Battle of Iwo Jima.

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.Res. 1099: Recognizing the 65th anniversary of the Battle of Iwo Jima.

111th Congress · introduced 2010-02-23 · Armed Forces and National Security · Latest: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2010-02-23 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Braley, Bruce L. [D-IA-1] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 168 (2010): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended, HRES1099 (2010-03-21), Passed. See all
  4. Where it stands now: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Recognizing the 65th anniversary of the Battle of Iwo Jima.

Plain summary

Recognizes the 65th anniversary of the Battle of Iwo Jima (World War II). Recognizes and commends all members of the U.S. Armed Forces who participated in such Battle for their service and sacrifice, with particular honor and gratitude to those gallant Americans who gave their lives during such Battle in defense of the United States and freedom.

Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

A Yea supports adopting this resolution.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Recognizing the 65th anniversary of the Battle of Iwo Jima.

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Braley, Bruce L. [D-IA-1] · 53 cosponsors

Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.

Cosponsors on this site

Darrell Issa (R-CA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Adam Smith (D-WA), Harold Rogers (R-KY), Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr. (D-GA), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Adrian Smith (R-NE), John B. Larson (D-CT), Robert J. Wittman (R-VA), James P. McGovern (D-MA), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Chellie Pingree (D-ME)

Recorded votes

Words on this page, explained (2)
Resolution
A formal statement or decision by a legislative body. Simple resolutions often only express an opinion or set rules for one chamber; they do not become law.
Roll-call vote
A vote where each member's position is recorded by name, so the public can see how every member voted. "Yea" means yes, "Nay" means no, "Present" means the member was there but did not take a side.

Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong111-hres1099 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong111 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong111