H.J.Res. 45: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.J.Res. 45: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.
112th Congress · introduced 2011-03-03 · Families · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2011-03-03 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Broun, Paul C. [R-GA-10] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.
Plain summary
Constitutional Amendment - Marriage Protection Amendment - Defines marriage in the United States as consisting only of the union of a man and a woman. Prohibits either the U.S. Constitution or the constitution of any state from being construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon any other union.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Broun, Paul C. [R-GA-10] · 32 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Marlin A. Stutzman (R-IN), Robert E. Latta (R-OH), Tim Walberg (R-MI), Robert J. Wittman (R-VA)
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Constitutional amendment
- A change to a constitution. In Texas the Legislature proposes an amendment with a joint resolution passed by two-thirds of the members of each chamber. It takes effect only if a majority of the people voting on it approve it. In Florida, an amendment needs at least 60% of the votes cast on it to pass.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-112hjres45.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/112/hjres>
Record fed-us-cong112-hjres45 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong112 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong112