H.R. 1085: Repealing Ineffective and Incomplete Abstinence-Only Program Funding Act of 2011
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 1085: Repealing Ineffective and Incomplete Abstinence-Only Program Funding Act of 2011
112th Congress · introduced 2011-03-15 · Families · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2011-03-15 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-9] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on Health. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Repealing Ineffective and Incomplete Abstinence-Only Program Funding Act of 2011
Plain summary
Repealing Ineffective and Incomplete Abstinence-Only Program Funding Act of 2011 - Amends title V (Maternal and Child Health Services) of the Social Security Act to: (1) eliminate the abstinence-only education program, (2) rescind unobligated FY2010-FY2011 program appropriations, and (3) reprogram such rescinded appropriations for the personal responsibility education program (PREP) for FY2012-FY2014.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Repealing Ineffective and Incomplete Abstinence-Only Program Funding Act of 2011
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Lee, Barbara [D-CA-9] · 55 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Diana DeGette (D-CO), James P. McGovern (D-MA), Gwen Moore (D-WI), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Janice D. Schakowsky (D-IL), Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), Judy Chu (D-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), James A. Himes (D-CT), Kathy Castor (D-FL), Adam Smith (D-WA), Nydia M. Velázquez (D-NY), Adam B. Schiff (D-CA), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
- Securities
- Financial investments that can be bought and sold, such as stocks and bonds.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-112hr1085.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/112/hr>
Record fed-us-cong112-hr1085 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong112 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong112