PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 1584: To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt maintenance activities from certain analysis requirements.

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 1584: To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt maintenance activities from certain analysis requirements.

112th Congress · introduced 2011-04-15 · Transportation and Public Works · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2011-04-15 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Lankford, James [R-OK-5] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
  4. Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Power. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt maintenance activities from certain analysis requirements.

Plain summary

Exempts activities of state departments of transportation to maintain the federal-aid highway system (including construction occurring within existing rights-of-way previously acquired and reserved for transportation purposes) from federal requirements to secure any permit, review, analysis, clearance, or impact statement.

Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt maintenance activities from certain analysis requirements.

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Lankford, James [R-OK-5] · 0 cosponsors

Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.

Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Lankford, James [R-OK-5] reported raising $1.2 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.

No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.

Words on this page, explained (1)
Exemption
A rule that removes certain people, property or activities from a tax or requirement.

Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong112-hr1584 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong112 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong112