H.R. 1775: Stolen Valor Act of 2012
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 1775: Stolen Valor Act of 2012
112th Congress · introduced 2011-05-05 · Armed Forces and National Security · Latest: Received in the Senate.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2011-05-05 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Heck, Joseph J. [R-NV-3] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 575 (2012): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, HR1775 (2012-09-13), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Received in the Senate. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Stolen Valor Act of 2012
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on September 10, 2012. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Stolen Valor Act of 2012 - Amends the federal criminal code to rewrite provisions relating to fraudulent claims about military service to subject to a fine, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both an individual who, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds himself or herself out to be a recipient of: a Congressional Medal of Honor, a distinguished-service cross, a Navy cross, an Air Force cross, a silver star, a Purple Heart, a Combat Infantryman's Badge, a Combat Action Badge, a Combat Medical Badge, a Combat Action Ribbon, a Combat Action Medal, or any replacement or duplicate medal for such medal as authorized by law.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Stolen Valor Act of 2012
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Heck, Joseph J. [R-NV-3] · 107 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Michael K. Simpson (R-ID), John Garamendi (D-CA), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (R-AR), Harold Rogers (R-KY), Steve Womack (R-AR), Ken Calvert (R-CA), Mark E. Amodei (R-NV), Gus M. Bilirakis (R-FL), Glenn Thompson (R-PA) and 47 more.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 575 (2012): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, HR1775 (2012-09-13): Passed
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Authorization
- A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-112hr1775.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/112/hr>
Record fed-us-cong112-hr1775 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong112 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong112