H.R. 2018: Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 2018: Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011
112th Congress · introduced 2011-05-26 · Environmental Protection · Latest: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 103.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2011-05-26 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Mica, John L. [R-FL-7] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 9 recorded votes in our records. Latest: House roll call 565 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13), Failed. See all
- Where it stands now: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 103. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011
Plain summary
Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011 - (Sec. 2) Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act) to prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from: (1) promulgating a revised or new water quality standard for a pollutant when the Administrator has approved a state water quality standard for such pollutant unless the state concurs with the Administrator's determination that the revised or new standard is necessary to meet the requirements of such Act; (2) taking action to supersede a state's determination that a discharge will comply with effluent limitations, water quality standards, controls on the discharge of pollutants, and toxic and pretreatment effluent standards under such Act; (3) withdrawing approval of a state program under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), limiting federal financial assistance for a state NPDES program, or objecting to the issuance of a NPDES permit by a state on the basis that the Administrator disagrees with the state regarding the implementation of an approved water quality standard or the implementation of any federal guidance that directs the interpretation of such standard; and (4) prohibiting the specification of any defined area as a disposal site for the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters and denying or restricting the use of such area as a disposal site in a permit if the state where the discharge originates does not concur with the Administrator's determination that the discharge will result in an unacceptable adverse effect on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds, and fishery areas. (Sec. 4) Shortens the period in which the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service must submit comments with respect to a general dredge and fill permit application. Requires the Administrator and other agencies to submit comments on an application for a general permit or a permit to discharge into navigable waters at specified disposal sites within 30 days (or 60 days if additional time is requested) after the date of receipt of such application. (Sec. 5) Applies this Act to actions taken on or after this Act's date of enactment, including actions taken with respect to permit applications that are pending or revised or new standards that are being promulgated. (Sec. 6) Requires the Administrator to report on any increase or reduction in waterborne pathogenic microorganisms (including protozoa, viruses, bacteria, and parasites), toxic chemicals, or toxic metals (such as lead and mercury) in waters regulated by a state under this Act. (Sec. 7) Prohibits this Act from being construed to limit the authority of the Administrator to regulate a pipeline that crosses a streambed. (Sec. 8) Requires the Administrator, before issuing a regulation, policy statement, guidance, response to a petition, or other requirement or implementing a new or substantially altered program under this Act, to analyze the impact, disaggregated by state, of such action on employment levels and economic activity. Directs the Administrator to: (1) post such analysis on EPA's website; (2) request that the governor of any state experiencing more than a de minimis negative impact on employment levels or economic activity (a loss of more than 100 jobs or a decrease in economic activity of more than $1 million) post such analysis in the state's Capitol; (3) hold a public hearing in each state where such action will have more than a de minimis negative impact; and (4) give notice of such impact to states' congressional delegations, governors, and legislatures.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Mica, John L. [R-FL-7] · 39 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (R-AR), Sam Graves (R-MO), Harold Rogers (R-KY), James Lankford (R-OK), H. Morgan Griffith (R-VA), Cynthia M. Lummis (R-WY), Brett Guthrie (R-KY)
Recorded votes
- House roll call 565 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 566 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Agreed to
- House roll call 567 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 568 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 569 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 570 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 571 (2011): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 572 (2011): On Motion to Recommit with Instructions, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Failed
- House roll call 573 (2011): On Passage, HR2018 (2011-07-13): Passed
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Federalism
- The sharing of power between a national government and state governments. Each level has its own powers, and some powers are shared. Counties and cities get their powers from their state.
- Rulemaking
- The process agencies use to write regulations that carry out laws passed by Congress or a legislature. Usually an agency publishes a proposed rule, takes public comments, then publishes a final rule.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-112hr2018.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/112/hr>
Record fed-us-cong112-hr2018 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong112 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong112