H.R. 4630: Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Boundary Study Act of 2012
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 4630: Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Boundary Study Act of 2012
112th Congress · introduced 2012-04-25 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2012-04-25 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Scott, David [D-GA-13] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Boundary Study Act of 2012
Plain summary
Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Boundary Study Act of 2012 - Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of including approximately 45 miles of the Chattahoochee River and lands along the river corridor from the southern boundary of the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area south to the junction of Coweta, Heard, and Carroll Counties, Georgia, within the boundary of the Recreation Area. Requires such study to include an analysis of the feasibility of administering the study area as part of the Recreation Area.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Boundary Study Act of 2012
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Scott, David [D-GA-13] · 0 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-112hr4630.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/112/hr>
Record fed-us-cong112-hr4630 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong112 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong112