H.J.Res. 88: United States Service Academies Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.J.Res. 88: United States Service Academies Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014
113th Congress · introduced 2013-10-04 · Armed Forces and National Security · Latest: Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2013-10-04 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Terry, Lee [R-NE-2] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
United States Service Academies Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014
Plain summary
United States Service Academies Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 - Makes appropriations, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for operations of the U.S. Military, Naval, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Merchant Marine academies for FY2014, and for other purposes, such amounts as may be necessary, at a rate for operations as provided for in the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-6), for projects or activities for the continuing operations of such academies not otherwise specifically provided for in the Pay Our Military Act (P.L. 113-39), that were conducted in FY2013, and for which appropriations, funds, or other authority were made available to the Department of Defense (DOD) by the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, in the following accounts: U.S. Military Academy, "Department of Defense--Operation and Maintenance, Army"; U.S. Naval Academy, "Department of Defense--Operation and Maintenance, Navy"; U.S. Air Force Academy, "Department of Defense--Operation and Maintenance, Air Force"; Coast Guard Academy, "Department of Homeland Security--Coast Guard--Operating Expenses"; and U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, "Department of Transportation--Maritime Administration--Operations and Training." Requires the rate of operations to be calculated to reflect the full amount of any reduction required in FY2013 pursuant to: (1) the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, and (2) the presidential sequestration order dated March 1, 2013, except as attributable to budget authority made available by the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 (P.L. 113-2). Makes appropriations and funds made available and authority granted under this joint resolution available until whichever of the following first occurs: (1) enactment into law of an appropriation for any project or activity provided for in this joint resolution, (2) enactment into law of the applicable appropriations Act for FY2014 without any provision for such project or activity, or (3) December 15, 2013. Requires implementation of this joint resolution so that only the most limited funding action be taken in order to provide for continuation of projects and activities.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
United States Service Academies Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Terry, Lee [R-NE-2] · 0 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (3)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
- Joint resolution
- In Texas, the type of measure the Legislature uses to propose a constitutional amendment (marked HJR or SJR). The governor does not sign or veto it; the voters decide. In Congress a joint resolution can also be used like a bill. In Florida, a joint resolution passed by three-fifths of the members of each chamber puts a constitutional amendment on the ballot.
- Resolution
- A formal statement or decision by a legislative body. Simple resolutions often only express an opinion or set rules for one chamber; they do not become law.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-113hjres88.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/113/hjres>
Record fed-us-cong113-hjres88 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong113 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong113