H.R. 1671: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, California, as the "James 'Jim' Kohnen Post Office".
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 1671: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, California, as the "James 'Jim' Kohnen Post Office".
113th Congress · introduced 2013-04-23 · Government Operations and Politics · Latest: Became Public Law No: 113-148.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2013-04-23 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-15] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 314 (2014): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, HR1671 (2014-06-17), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 113-148. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, California, as the "James 'Jim' Kohnen Post Office".
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, California, as the "James 'Jim' Kohnen Post Office."
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, California, as the "James 'Jim' Kohnen Post Office".
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-15] · 52 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Ami Bera (D-CA), Julia Brownley (D-CA), Ken Calvert (R-CA), Judy Chu (D-CA), Jim Costa (D-CA), John Garamendi (D-CA), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Doris O. Matsui (D-CA), Tom McClintock (R-CA), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Scott H. Peters (D-CA), Raul Ruiz (D-CA), Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA), Adam B. Schiff (D-CA), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Mark Takano (D-CA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), David G. Valadao (R-CA), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Maxine Waters (D-CA)
Recorded votes
- House roll call 314 (2014): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, HR1671 (2014-06-17): Passed
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-113hr1671.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/113/hr>
Record fed-us-cong113-hr1671 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong113 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong113