H.R. 316: Collinsville Renewable Energy Production Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 316: Collinsville Renewable Energy Production Act
113th Congress · introduced 2013-01-18 · Energy · Latest: Became Public Law No: 113-122.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2013-01-18 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Esty, Elizabeth H. [D-CT-5] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 340 (2014): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendment, HR316 (2014-06-23), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 113-122. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Collinsville Renewable Energy Production Act
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on June 27, 2013. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Collinsville Renewable Energy Production Act - Authorizes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), upon request of the town of Canton, Connecticut (Town), to: (1) reinstate the expired license for either or each of the projects numbered 10822 and 10823; (2) extend for two years after the date on which either or each such project is reinstated the time period during which the licensee must commence project construction, and (3) transfer such license to the Town upon a showing that the transfer is in the public interest. Sets forth the conditions of such transfer, including those for the protection, mitigation, and enhancement of fish and wildlife and related habitat. Directs FERC to supplement the environmental impact statement or similar analysis prepared in connection with the issuance of the original license to examine all new circumstances and information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the reinstatement or impact of the license.
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Collinsville Renewable Energy Production Act
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Esty, Elizabeth H. [D-CT-5] · 0 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 340 (2014): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Concur in the Senate Amendment, HR316 (2014-06-23): Passed
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-113hr316.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/113/hr>
Record fed-us-cong113-hr316 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong113 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong113