H.R. 5078: Waters of the United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act of 2014
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 5078: Waters of the United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act of 2014
113th Congress · introduced 2014-07-11 · Environmental Protection · Latest: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 559.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2014-07-11 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Southerland, Steve II [R-FL-2] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 4 recorded votes in our records. Latest: House roll call 486 (2014): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR5078 (2014-09-09), Failed. See all
- Where it stands now: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 559. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Waters of the United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act of 2014
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the House reported version is repeated here.) Waters of the United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act of 2014 - Prohibits the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from: developing, finalizing, adopting, implementing, applying, administering, or enforcing the proposed rule entitled, "Definition of 'Waters of the United States' Under the Clean Water Act," issued on April 21, 2014, or the proposed guidance entitled, "Guidance on Identifying Waters Protected By the Clean Water Act," dated February 17, 2012; or using the proposed rule or proposed guidance, any successor document, or any substantially similar proposed rule or guidance as the basis for any rulemaking or decision regarding the scope or enforcement of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act). Requires the Army Corps and the EPA to withdraw the interpretive rule entitled, "Notice of Availability Regarding the Exemption from Permitting Under Section 404(f)(1)(A) of the Clean Water Act to Certain Agricultural Conservation Practices," issued on April 21, 2014. Requires the Army Corps and the EPA to: (1) consult with relevant state and local officials to develop recommendations for a regulatory proposal that would identify the scope of waters covered under the Clean Water Act and the scope of waters not covered; (2) provide for the public review and comment of a draft report that includes a recommendation only if consensus has been reached with regard to the recommendation among the Army Corps, the EPA, and state and local officials; (3) publish a final report; and (4) report to Congress on the recommendations.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House without amendment), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Waters of the United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act of 2014
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House without amendment)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Southerland, Steve II [R-FL-2] · 120 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Eric A. "Rick" Crawford (R-AR), Frank D. Lucas (R-OK), Scott Perry (R-PA), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Jason Smith (R-MO), Tom McClintock (R-CA), James Lankford (R-OK), Paul A. Gosar (R-AZ), Sam Graves (R-MO), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Steve Womack (R-AR), Robert E. Latta (R-OH), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mike Kelly (R-PA) and 60 more.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 486 (2014): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR5078 (2014-09-09): Failed
- House roll call 487 (2014): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR5078 (2014-09-09): Failed
- House roll call 488 (2014): On Motion to Recommit with Instructions, HR5078 (2014-09-09): Failed
- House roll call 489 (2014): On Passage, HR5078 (2014-09-09): Passed
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Exemption
- A rule that removes certain people, property or activities from a tax or requirement.
- Rulemaking
- The process agencies use to write regulations that carry out laws passed by Congress or a legislature. Usually an agency publishes a proposed rule, takes public comments, then publishes a final rule.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House without amendment)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-113hr5078.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/113/hr>
Record fed-us-cong113-hr5078 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong113 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong113