H.R. 749: Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 749: Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion Act
113th Congress · introduced 2013-02-15 · Finance and Financial Sector · Latest: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2013-02-15 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Luetkemeyer, Blaine [R-MO-3] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion Act
Plain summary
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion Act - Amends the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to exempt from its annual privacy policy notice requirement any financial institution which: (1) provides nonpublic personal information only in accordance with specified requirements, and (2) has not changed its policies and practices with regard to disclosing nonpublic personal information from those disclosed in the most recent disclosure sent to consumers.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House without amendment), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Eliminate Privacy Notice Confusion Act
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House without amendment)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Luetkemeyer, Blaine [R-MO-3] · 73 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Brad Sherman (D-CA), Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Sam Graves (R-MO), Gregory W. Meeks (D-NY), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Paul A. Gosar (R-AZ), Gary C. Peters (D-MI), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Chellie Pingree (D-ME), Tim Walberg (R-MI), Peter Welch (D-VT), John B. Larson (D-CT), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Gus M. Bilirakis (R-FL), Robert E. Latta (R-OH), Gwen Moore (D-WI), André Carson (D-IN), Bill Foster (D-IL) and 13 more.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Exemption
- A rule that removes certain people, property or activities from a tax or requirement.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House without amendment)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-113hr749.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/113/hr>
Record fed-us-cong113-hr749 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong113 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong113