H.R. 1174: Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 1174: Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act
114th Congress · introduced 2015-02-27 · Crime and Law Enforcement · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2015-02-27 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act
Plain summary
Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act Amends the federal criminal code to authorize a governmental entity to require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service of the contents of a wire or electronic communication that is in electronic storage with or otherwise stored, held, or maintained by the provider only pursuant to a warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Authorizes such a warrant to require such disclosure regardless of where such contents may be in electronic storage or otherwise stored, held, or maintained by the provider if the holder of the account the contents of which are sought by the warrant is a U.S. person. Requires a court, on a service provider's motion, to modify or vacate such a warrant upon finding that it would require the provider to violate the laws of a foreign country. Sets forth requirements for government notification of provider customers or subscribers regarding the receipt of communication contents pursuant to such a warrant. Directs the Attorney General to: (1) establish a form for use by a foreign government filing a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) request; (2) establish an online docketing system for all MLAT requests; and (3) publish statistics annually on MLAT requests made by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to foreign governments, and by foreign governments to DOJ, to obtain the contents of communications or other information or records from a provider of electronic communications or remote computing services. Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) data localization requirements imposed by foreign governments on data providers are incompatible with the borderless nature of the Internet, an impediment to online innovation, and unnecessary to meet the needs of law enforcement; and (2) DOJ, the Department of State, and the U.S. Trade Representative should pursue open data flow policies with foreign nations.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Marino, Tom [R-PA-10] · 137 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Suzan K. DelBene (D-WA), Mark E. Amodei (R-NV), Earl L. "Buddy" Carter (R-GA), Sam Graves (R-MO), Scott H. Peters (D-CA), Glenn Grothman (R-WI), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Norma J. Torres (D-CA), Frank D. Lucas (R-OK), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Yvette D. Clarke (D-NY), Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), André Carson (D-IN), Glenn Thompson (R-PA), Michael K. Simpson (R-ID), Rick Larsen (D-WA), Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Dan Newhouse (R-WA), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Roger Williams (R-TX), Paul Tonko (D-NY) and 77 more.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Authorization
- A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
- Jurisdiction
- The area or the matters a government or court has authority over.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-114hr1174.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/114/hr>
Record fed-us-cong114-hr1174 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong114 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong114