PSI Sci
New here? Follow the money and the votes · Not sure of your district? Find your U.S. House member · Find your state legislators

H.R. 1457: AMP Act

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 1457: AMP Act

114th Congress · introduced 2015-03-19 · Commerce · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

  1. Where it came from: introduced 2015-03-19 · official record
  2. Who proposed it: Rep. Crowley, Joseph [D-NY-14] · what a sponsor is
  3. What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
  4. Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
  5. If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

AMP Act

Plain summary

Allocation for Music Producers Act or the AMP Act Amends federal copyright law to require a collective designated by the Copyright Royalty Judges to implement a policy providing for the acceptance of instructions (referred to as a "letter of direction") from a person who owns the exclusive right to publicly perform a sound recording by means of a digital audio transmission, or from a recording artist of a such a sound recording, to distribute a portion of royalty payments to a producer, mixer, or sound engineer who was part of the creative process behind the sound recording. Requires the collective to adopt special procedures for a producer, mixer, or sound engineer to receive a portion of royalties for recordings fixed before November 1, 1995, by certifying that a reasonable effort has been made to obtain a letter of direction from an artist who owns the right to receipts payable with respect to the sound recording.

Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Crowley, Joseph [D-NY-14] · 49 cosponsors

Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.

Cosponsors on this site

Ted Lieu (D-CA), Janice D. Schakowsky (D-IL), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), Judy Chu (D-CA), Julia Brownley (D-CA), Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA), Adam B. Schiff (D-CA), Grace Meng (D-NY), Michael T. McCaul (R-TX), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Gregory W. Meeks (D-NY), Peter Welch (D-VT), Raul Ruiz (D-CA), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.

Sources

Record fed-us-cong114-hr1457 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong114 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong114