H.R. 427: Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015

Before you vote › Federal bills

H.R. 427: Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015

114th Congress · introduced 2015-01-21 · Government Operations and Politics · Latest: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 307.

federal

Save to my notebook What does this mean? Print

Official title

Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015

Plain summary

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015 (Sec. 2) States that the purpose of this Act is to increase accountability for and transparency in the federal regulatory process by requiring Congress to approve all new major regulations. (Sec. 3) Revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking to require a federal agency promulgating a rule to publish information about the rule in the Federal Register and include in its report to Congress and to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) a classification of the rule as a major or non-major rule and a complete copy of the cost-benefit analysis of the rule, including an analysis of any jobs added or lost, differentiating between public and private sector jobs. Defines "major rule" as any rule that is made under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget finds has resulted in or is likely to result in: (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. Requires a joint resolution of approval of major rules to be enacted before such rules may take effect (currently, major rules take effect unless a joint resolution disapproving them is enacted). Provides that if a joint resolution of approval is not enacted by the end of 70 session days or legislative days, as applicable, after the agency proposing the rule submits its report on such rule to Congress, the major rule shall be deemed not to be approved and shall not take effect. Permits a major rule to take effect for one 90-calendar day period without such approval if the President determines it is necessary because of an imminent threat to health or safety or other emergency, for the enforcement of criminal laws, for national security, or to implement an international trade agreement. Sets forth the congressional approval procedure for major rules and the congressional disapproval procedure for non-major rules. Prohibits an agency from allowing a major rule to take effect without the congressional review procedures set forth in this Act. Requires the introduction of a joint resolution addressing a report classifying a rule as a major rule within three legislative days in the House of Representative and three session days in the Senate. Prohibits any amendments to such a joint resolution at any stage of the legislative process. Provides for expedited consideration of a joint resolution of approval and requires a vote on such resolution in the Senate within 15 session days after it is reported by the committee to which it was referred, or after such committee has been discharged from further consideration of the resolution. Allows a court to review whether an agency has completed the necessary requirements under this Act for a rule to take effect (currently, no judicial review of a determination, finding, action, or omission in the rulemaking process is subject to judicial review). Limits the effect of a joint resolution of approval of a major rule. Makes this Act inapplicable to rules that concern monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee. Provides that any rule promulgated by a federal agency that relates to a regulatory program for a commercial, recreational, or subsistence activity related to hunting, fishing, or camping, or any rule other than a major rule for which an agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, shall take effect at such time as the agency determines. (Sec. 4) Amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to provide that any congressional approval procedure set forth in this Act affecting budget authority, outlays, or receipts shall be assumed to be effective unless it is not approved in accordance with this Act. (Sec. 5) Directs the GAO to conduct a study to determine as of the date of enactment of this Act: (1) how many rules were in effect, (2) how many major rules were in effect, and (3) the total estimated economic cost imposed by all such rules. Requires a report to Congress on such study within one year of the enactment of this Act.

Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

The strongest published arguments

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Young, Todd [R-IN-9] · 171 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 427, Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015 (2015-04-28)

Cosponsors on this site

Thomas Massie (R-KY), Michael K. Simpson (R-ID), Scott DesJarlais (R-TN), Adrian Smith (R-NE), David Rouzer (R-NC), Pete Sessions (R-TX), Randy K. Weber, Sr. (R-TX), Michael R. Turner (R-OH), Mike Kelly (R-PA), Joe Wilson (R-SC), Michael T. McCaul (R-TX), Sam Graves (R-MO), Roger Williams (R-TX), Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Robert E. Latta (R-OH), Tim Walberg (R-MI), Paul A. Gosar (R-AZ), Tom McClintock (R-CA) and 111 more.

Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Young, Todd [R-IN-9] reported raising $5.1 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.

Recorded votes

• House roll call 473 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Agreed to
• House roll call 474 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Agreed to
• House roll call 475 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 476 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 477 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 478 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 479 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 480 (2015): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 481 (2015): On Motion to Recommit with Instructions, HR427 (2015-07-28): Failed
• House roll call 482 (2015): On Passage, HR427 (2015-07-28): Passed

Sources

• Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House amended)
• Congress.gov
• Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-114hr427.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/114/hr>

Record fed-us-cong114-hr427 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong114 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong114