H.R. 4321: Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 4321: Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act
114th Congress · introduced 2016-01-06 · Government Operations and Politics · Latest: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2016-01-06 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act
Plain summary
Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act This bill expresses the sense of Congress that any executive order, memoranda, proclamation, or signing statement issued by the President that infringes on the powers and duties of Congress under article I, section 8 of the Constitution or the Second Amendment, or that would require the expenditure of federal funds not specifically appropriated for such executive action, is advisory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as law. The bill nullifies any such executive action and prohibits the use of appropriated funds to promulgate or enforce any such action. The following persons may bring a civil action in an appropriate U.S. district court to challenge the validity of any such executive action: (1) any Member or either or both chambers of Congress, (2) the highest governmental official of any state or political subdivision if the challenged action infringes on a power of such state under any congressional enactment or relevant treaty, and (3) any person aggrieved of the challenged executive action with respect to a liberty or property interest adversely affected directly by the executive action.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection Act
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3] · 78 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Earl L. "Buddy" Carter (R-GA), Paul A. Gosar (R-AZ), Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), David Schweikert (R-AZ), Ryan K. Zinke (R-MT), David P. Joyce (R-OH), Glenn Grothman (R-WI), Dan Newhouse (R-WA), Tom Cole (R-OK), Gary J. Palmer (R-AL), Bruce Westerman (R-AR), David Rouzer (R-NC), Mike Rogers (R-AL), Pete Sessions (R-TX), Brian Babin (R-TX), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Robert B. Aderholt (R-AL), Randy K. Weber, Sr. (R-TX), Sam Graves (R-MO), Cynthia M. Lummis (R-WY), Frank D. Lucas (R-OK), Tim Walberg (R-MI), Joe Wilson (R-SC) and 18 more.
Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3] reported raising $967,095 (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Appropriation
- Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
- Bill
- A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-114hr4321.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/114/hr>
Record fed-us-cong114-hr4321 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong114 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong114