H.R. 2288: Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 2288: Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017
115th Congress · introduced 2017-05-02 · Armed Forces and National Security · Latest: Signed by President.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2017-05-02 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 273 (2017): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, HR2288 (2017-05-23), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Signed by President. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017
Plain summary
Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 This bill revises the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability claims appeals system. (Sec. 2) Specifically, the bill requires the VA to assist with a claim or supplemental claim up until a veteran claimant is provided notice of a decision. Additionally, the VA must assist a veteran during a higher-level review if an adjudicator identifies an error on the part of the agency of original jurisdiction. The bill also requires the VA to provide a notice of decision to veterans regarding decisions affecting the provision of benefits that includes specific information, such as a summary of the applicable laws and an explanation of how to obtain evidence used in making the decision. Under the bill, findings that are favorable to the veteran are considered binding unless clear and convincing evidence is shown to rebut the findings. The bill permits a veteran to appeal a decision within one year by (1) requesting a review of the agency of original jurisdiction's decision by a higher-level adjudicator using the same evidentiary record; (2) filing a supplemental claim with a regional office that includes the opportunity to submit additional evidence and have a hearing; or (3) appealing directly to the Board of Veterans' Appeals, with the opportunity to select an expedited review to submit new evidence but without a hearing, or to select a review with the option to submit new evidence and request a hearing. The bill authorizes veterans to retain the services of attorneys and accredited agents who charge a fee when the agency of original jurisdiction provides notice of the original decision. The bill prescribes specific procedures on the filing of a notice of disagreement with the Board of Veterans' Appeals, including form and timing. If no notice of disagreement is filed, the decision becomes final except in certain circumstances. The bill modifies the maintenance of dockets by the Board of Veterans' Appeals and the procedures for advancing the docket and holding hearings. The bill sets forth the type of evidence that is permitted in the record for cases with a request for hearing, and also for cases with no request for a hearing. Additionally, the bill requires the Board of Veterans' Appeals to provide written notice to the appellant if the board does not review evidence that the veteran did not submit in time. The bill requires the VA, prior to full implementation, to certify to Congress that it has sufficient resources and personnel to carry out the existing and updated appeals systems. (Sec. 3) Under the bill, the VA must submit a comprehensive plan for resolving pending appeals, and implementing the updated appeals system. (Sec. 4) The bill authorizes the VA to carry out various pilot programs to test the updated appeals system and alternative processes as long as it notifies Congress of such testing. (Sec. 5) Lastly, the bill requires the VA to publish information on the VA's website regarding the processing of existing appeals and appeals in the updated system.
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12] · 26 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 2288, Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (2017-05-19)
Cosponsors on this site
Gus M. Bilirakis (R-FL), Mark Takano (D-CA), Julia Brownley (D-CA), Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (R-AS), Neal P. Dunn (R-FL), J. Luis Correa (D-CA), Jodey C. Arrington (R-TX), John H. Rutherford (R-FL), Scott H. Peters (D-CA), Clay Higgins (R-LA), Jack Bergman (R-MI), Jim Banks (R-IN), Dina Titus (D-NV), Earl L. "Buddy" Carter (R-GA)
Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12] reported raising $1.6 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 273 (2017): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, HR2288 (2017-05-23): Passed
Words on this page, explained (2)
- Bill
- A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).
- Jurisdiction
- The area or the matters a government or court has authority over.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-115hr2288.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/115/hr>
Record fed-us-cong115-hr2288 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong115 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong115