H.R. 1373: Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act

116th Congress · introduced 2019-02-26 · Public Lands and Natural Resources · Latest: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

federal

Follow this bill, step by step

Where it came from: introduced 2019-02-26 · official record
Who proposed it: Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-3] · what a sponsor is
What happened next: 5 recorded votes in our records. Latest: House roll call 598 (2019): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR1373 (2019-10-30), Failed. See all
Where it stands now: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.

What does this mean?

Official title

Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act

Plain summary

Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act This bill withdraws 1,006,545 acres of federal lands in Arizona, including any land or interest in land acquired by the United States after enactment of this bill, from entry, appropriation, and disposal under the public land laws; location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and operation of the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing laws and mineral materials laws.

Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.

What a vote does

A “Yea” vote

If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.

A “Nay” vote

If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.

PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).

What does this mean? (plain words)

Official text

Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act

Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House)

AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text

No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.

Limited to a few requests an hour per person.

The strongest published arguments

Arguments for (supporters)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Arguments against (opponents)

Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

Alternatives

Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.

How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes

Officials and money

Sponsor: Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-3] · 122 cosponsors

Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: H.R. 1373, Grand Canyon Centennial Protection Act (2019-08-06)

Cosponsors on this site

Debbie Dingell (D-MI), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Mike Levin (D-CA), Mike Quigley (D-IL), Salud O. Carbajal (D-CA), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Janice D. Schakowsky (D-IL), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Nydia M. Velázquez (D-NY), Sean Casten (D-IL), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Joe Neguse (D-CO), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Ed Case (D-HI), Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), Scott H. Peters (D-CA), Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ), Bradley Scott Schneider (D-IL), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL), Adam B. Schiff (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), Veronica Escobar (D-TX), James P. McGovern (D-MA), Seth Moulton (D-MA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Richard E. Neal (D-MA), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Mark Pocan (D-WI), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Judy Chu (D-CA), Steven Horsford (D-NV), Jesús G. "Chuy" García (D-IL), Peter Welch (D-VT), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Mark Takano (D-CA), Darren Soto (D-FL) and 62 more.

Recorded votes

House roll call 598 (2019): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR1373 (2019-10-30): Failed
House roll call 599 (2019): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR1373 (2019-10-30): Failed
House roll call 600 (2019): On Agreeing to the Amendment, HR1373 (2019-10-30): Failed
House roll call 601 (2019): On Motion to Recommit with Instructions, HR1373 (2019-10-30): Failed
House roll call 602 (2019): On Passage, HR1373 (2019-10-30): Passed

Words on this page, explained (2)

Appropriation: Money a legislature sets aside by law for a specific purpose. Government agencies may spend public money only as it has been appropriated.
Bill: A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).

Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.

Sources

Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House)
Congress.gov
Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-116hr1373.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/116/hr>

Record fed-us-cong116-hr1373 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong116 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong116