H.R. 5983: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4150 Chicago Avenue in Riverside, California, as the Woodie Rucker-Hughes Post Office Building.
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 5983: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4150 Chicago Avenue in Riverside, California, as the Woodie Rucker-Hughes Post Office Building.
116th Congress · introduced 2020-02-26 · Government Operations and Politics · Latest: Became Public Law No: 116-307.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2020-02-26 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 116-307. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4150 Chicago Avenue in Riverside, California, as the Woodie Rucker-Hughes Post Office Building.
Plain summary
Designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4150 Chicago Avenue in Riverside, California, as the "Woodie Rucker-Hughes Post Office Building."
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4150 Chicago Avenue in Riverside, California, as the Woodie Rucker-Hughes Post Office Building.
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41] · 50 cosponsors
Cosponsors on this site
Norma J. Torres (D-CA), Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. (D-CA), Ken Calvert (R-CA), Pete Aguilar (D-CA), Raul Ruiz (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Adam B. Schiff (D-CA), Judy Chu (D-CA), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Jared Huffman (D-CA), Jim Costa (D-CA), Scott H. Peters (D-CA), Ami Bera (D-CA), Brad Sherman (D-CA), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Tom McClintock (R-CA), Mike Levin (D-CA), J. Luis Correa (D-CA), Salud O. Carbajal (D-CA), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Josh Harder (D-CA), John Garamendi (D-CA), Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA), Julia Brownley (D-CA), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Doris O. Matsui (D-CA)
Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-41] reported raising $1.1 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-116hr5983.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/116/hr>
Record fed-us-cong116-hr5983 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong116 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong116