H.R. 6364: Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2020
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.R. 6364: Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2020
116th Congress · introduced 2020-03-23 · Law · Latest: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2020-03-23 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2020
Plain summary
Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2020 This bill allows a notary public commissioned under state law to remotely notarize electronic records and requires recognition of notarizations performed under the laws of other states. Under the bill, a notary public may remotely notarize electronic records occurring in or affecting interstate commerce if (1) the individual and the notary public are able to electronically communicate by sight and sound simultaneously (i.e., by video chat); (2) the notary verifies the individual's identity and records the notarization; and (3) the notarization complies with other requirements, such as those relating to the attachment of a stamp or seal to the electronic record. Additionally, the bill allows a notary public to remotely notarize electronic records involving an individual located outside of the United States, subject to certain requirements. The bill also requires U.S. courts and states to recognize notarizations, including remote notarizations of electronic records, that occur in or affect interstate commerce and are performed by a notary public commissioned under the laws of other states.
Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Securing and Enabling Commerce Using Remote and Electronic Notarization Act of 2020
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14] · 82 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Madeleine Dean (D-PA), Lucy McBath (D-GA), Brian K. Fitzpatrick (R-PA), Veronica Escobar (D-TX), David Kustoff (R-TN), William R. Timmons IV (R-SC), Ben Cline (R-VA), Jim Costa (D-CA), Steve Cohen (D-TN), John Joyce (R-PA), W. Gregory Steube (R-FL), Michael T. McCaul (R-TX), Darren Soto (D-FL), Bryan Steil (R-WI), Ted Budd (R-NC), David Rouzer (R-NC), Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Joe Neguse (D-CO), Joyce Beatty (D-OH), Don Bacon (R-NE), Lance Gooden (R-TX), Jason Smith (R-MO), Andy Barr (R-KY), Jefferson Van Drew (R-NJ), Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Pete Stauber (R-MN), Bill Foster (D-IL), Jim Banks (R-IN), Robert J. Wittman (R-VA), Glenn Thompson (R-PA), Lloyd Smucker (R-PA), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Daniel Meuser (R-PA), Mark Pocan (D-WI) and 22 more.
Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. Reschenthaler, Guy [R-PA-14] reported raising $5.0 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Bill
- A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Introduced in House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-116hr6364.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/116/hr>
Record fed-us-cong116-hr6364 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong116 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong116