H.Res. 430: Authorizing the Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings to enforce certain subpoenas and for other purposes.
Before you vote › Federal bills
H.Res. 430: Authorizing the Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings to enforce certain subpoenas and for other purposes.
116th Congress · introduced 2019-06-06 · Law · Latest: COMMUNICATION TO THE HOUSE - The House received a communication from Jerrold Nadler, Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary. Chairman Nadler notified the House of the initiation by the Committee on the Judiciary of the following judicial proceedings pursuant to H. Res. 430: 1. In Re: Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials, Misc. no. 1:19-gj-00048-BAH filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on July 26, 2019. 2. Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives v. McGahn, No. 1:19-cv-2379 filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on August 7, 2019.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2019-06-06 · official record
- Who proposed it: Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: House roll call 247 (2019): On Agreeing to the Resolution, HRES430 (2019-06-11), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: COMMUNICATION TO THE HOUSE - The House received a communication from Jerrold Nadler, Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary. Chairman Nadler notified the House of the initiation by the Committee on the Judiciary of the following judicial proceedings pursuant to H. Res. 430: 1. In Re: Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials, Misc. no. 1:19-gj-00048-BAH filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on July 26, 2019. 2. Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives v. McGahn, No. 1:19-cv-2379 filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on August 7, 2019. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Authorizing the Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings to enforce certain subpoenas and for other purposes.
Plain summary
This resolution authorizes the House Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in federal judicial proceedings to enforce compliance with certain subpoenas issued to Attorney General William Barr and former White House Counsel Donald McGahn. Additionally, the resolution provides explicit authority for each congressional committee, if authorized by the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, to initiate or intervene in federal judicial proceedings to enforce compliance with congressional subpoenas.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
A Yea supports adopting this resolution.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Authorizing the Committee on the Judiciary to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings to enforce certain subpoenas and for other purposes.
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] · 65 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Richard E. Neal (D-MA), Adam B. Schiff (D-CA), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Norma J. Torres (D-CA), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA), Joseph D. Morelle (D-NY), Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA), Sean Casten (D-IL), Steve Cohen (D-TN), Jimmy Gomez (D-CA), Grace Meng (D-NY), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Veronica Escobar (D-TX), Ted Lieu (D-CA), Salud O. Carbajal (D-CA), Madeleine Dean (D-PA), Sylvia R. Garcia (D-TX), Janice D. Schakowsky (D-IL), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Alma S. Adams (D-NC), Mike Thompson (D-CA), Yvette D. Clarke (D-NY), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ), Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), Rosa L. DeLauro (D-CT), Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-CA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), Joe Neguse (D-CO), Adam Smith (D-WA), Doris O. Matsui (D-CA), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) and 5 more.
Sponsor's campaign money: Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2] reported raising $1.0 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
Recorded votes
- House roll call 247 (2019): On Agreeing to the Resolution, HRES430 (2019-06-11): Passed
Words on this page, explained (3)
- Authorization
- A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
- Resolution
- A formal statement or decision by a legislative body. Simple resolutions often only express an opinion or set rules for one chamber; they do not become law.
- Roll-call vote
- A vote where each member's position is recorded by name, so the public can see how every member voted. "Yea" means yes, "Nay" means no, "Present" means the member was there but did not take a side.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed House)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-116hres430.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/116/hres>
Record fed-us-cong116-hres430 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong116 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong116