S. 151: Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act
Before you vote › Federal bills
S. 151: Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act
116th Congress · introduced 2019-01-16 · Science, Technology, Communications · Latest: Became Public Law No: 116-105.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2019-01-16 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 2 recorded votes in our records. Latest: House roll call 647 (2019): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, S151 (2019-12-04), Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Became Public Law No: 116-105. (final step reached)
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act
Plain summary
Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act or the Pallone-Thune TRACED Act This bill establishes rules and requirements to deter criminal robocall violations. Specifically, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) must require voice service providers to develop call authentication technologies; initiate a rulemaking to protect a subscriber from receiving unwanted calls or texts from a caller using an unauthenticated number; establish when a provider may block a voice call based on information provided by the call authentication framework, but also establish a process to permit a calling party adversely affected by the framework to verify the authenticity of their calls; streamline the ways in which a private entity may voluntarily share information with the FCC relating to a call or text message that violates robocall restrictions; determine whether its policies regarding access to number resources could be modified to help reduce access to numbers by potential robocall violators; report on the implementation of the reassigned number database; implement consumer protections for exempted classes of robocalls; ensure opt-out/opt-in robocall blocking services provide transparency and redress options for consumers and callers with no additional line item charge to consumers or additional charge to callers for resolving complaints related to erroneously blocked calls; study whether to require a provider of a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service to give the FCC its contact information and retain a record of each call transmitted over the VoIP service that is sufficient to trace a call back to its source; provide the Department of Justice with any evidence obtained suggesting a robocall violation made with an intent to defraud or cause harm; protect called parties from one-ring scams (where a caller allows the call to ring for a short duration to prompt the called party to return the call and incur charges); establish a registration process for a single consortium that conducts private-led efforts to trace back the origin of suspected unlawful robocalls; and establish the Hospital Robocall Protection Group to issue best practices for combating unlawful robocalls made to hospitals, helping hospitals protect themselves, and assisting federal and state governments to combat such calls. The bill also implements a forfeiture penalty for violations (with or without intent) of the prohibitions on certain robocalls.
Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] · 84 cosponsors
Cost estimate: CBO cost estimate: S. 151, TRACED Act (2019-05-09)
Cosponsors on this site
Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), John Hoeven (R-ND), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), Deb Fischer (R-NE), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Angus S. King, Jr. (I-ME), Todd Young (R-IN), Roger F. Wicker (R-MS), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Rick Scott (R-FL), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Steve Daines (R-MT), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), John Barrasso (R-WY), John Cornyn (R-TX), Gary C. Peters (D-MI), Jack Reed (D-RI), John Boozman (R-AR), Tina Smith (D-MN), Mike Rounds (R-SD), James Lankford (R-OK), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Susan M. Collins (R-ME), John Kennedy (R-LA), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Margaret Wood Hassan (D-NH), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Michael F. Bennet (D-CO), Christopher A. Coons (D-DE) and 24 more.
Sponsor's campaign money: Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] reported raising $4.7 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
Recorded votes
- Senate vote 127 (2019): On Passage of the Bill, S151 (2019-05-23): Bill Passed
- House roll call 647 (2019): On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, S151 (2019-12-04): Passed
Words on this page, explained (3)
- Bill
- A proposed law. It becomes law only if it passes the legislature and is signed by the president or governor (or a veto is overridden).
- Exemption
- A rule that removes certain people, property or activities from a tax or requirement.
- Rulemaking
- The process agencies use to write regulations that carry out laws passed by Congress or a legislature. Usually an agency publishes a proposed rule, takes public comments, then publishes a final rule.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Public Law)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-116s151.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/116/s>
Record fed-us-cong116-s151 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong116 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong116