S.Res. 192: A resolution to authorize testimony and representation in State of Nevada v. Lacamera.
Before you vote › Federal bills
S.Res. 192: A resolution to authorize testimony and representation in State of Nevada v. Lacamera.
116th Congress · introduced 2019-05-07 · Congress · Latest: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700)
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2019-05-07 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. McConnell, Mitch [R-KY] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: no floor votes in our records yet. Why?
- Where it stands now: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2700; consideration: CR S2700-2701; text: CR S2699-2700) Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
A resolution to authorize testimony and representation in State of Nevada v. Lacamera.
Plain summary
This resolution authorizes (1) Ariana Morales, an employee of the Office of Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, and any other current or former employee of the Senator's office from whom relevant evidence may be necessary, to testify in the case of State of Nevada v. Lacamera , except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted; and (2) the Senate Legal Counsel to represent Senator Cortez Masto and those employees in connection with this case.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
A Yea supports adopting this resolution.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
A resolution to authorize testimony and representation in State of Nevada v. Lacamera.
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. McConnell, Mitch [R-KY] · 1 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Charles E. Schumer (D-NY)
Sponsor's campaign money: Sen. McConnell, Mitch [R-KY] reported raising $278,697 (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
No linked floor roll calls in our collected records yet. This does not mean the bill has never had a vote. Check the official bill history.
Words on this page, explained (3)
- Authorization
- A law that creates or continues a government program and says what it may do, often with a suggested spending ceiling. An authorization alone does not provide money; a separate appropriation does.
- Resolution
- A formal statement or decision by a legislative body. Simple resolutions often only express an opinion or set rules for one chamber; they do not become law.
- Roll-call vote
- A vote where each member's position is recorded by name, so the public can see how every member voted. "Yea" means yes, "Nay" means no, "Present" means the member was there but did not take a side.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-116sres192.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/116/sres>
Record fed-us-cong116-sres192 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong116 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong116