S.J.Res. 63: A joint resolution relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
Before you vote › Federal bills
S.J.Res. 63: A joint resolution relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
117th Congress · introduced 2022-09-22 · Emergency Management · Latest: Held at the desk.
federal
Follow this bill, step by step
- Where it came from: introduced 2022-09-22 · official record
- Who proposed it: Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS] · what a sponsor is
- What happened next: 1 recorded vote in our records. Latest: Senate vote 355 (2022): On the Joint Resolution, SJRES63 (2022-11-15), Joint Resolution Passed. See all
- Where it stands now: Held at the desk. Not final yet: this can still change. We check for updates every day.
- If it becomes law and spends money: follow the money to money laws, then agencies and contracts and grants.
Official title
A joint resolution relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
Plain summary
This joint resolution terminates the national emergency concerning COVID-19 declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate), quoted unchanged (nonpartisan). Read the source.
What a vote does
A “Yea” vote
If it passes both chambers and is signed, it becomes law.
A “Nay” vote
If it is not passed, current law stays as it is.
PSI Sci description of the legislative step (not an opinion).
What does this mean? (plain words)
Official text
A joint resolution relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
Source: Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate)
AI explanation – may be wrong, check the official text
No AI explanation yet. It takes up to a minute to write and is then saved for everyone.
Limited to a few requests an hour per person.
The strongest published arguments
Arguments for (supporters)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Arguments against (opponents)
Needs sources: no published arguments on this side yet. We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
Alternatives
Needs sources: no published alternatives yet (for example a different bill, a law instead of an amendment, or keeping current law). We only show items backed by a published source. Suggest one.
How did my representative vote? · This bill's floor votes
Officials and money
Sponsor: Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS] · 9 cosponsors
Cost estimate: No cost estimate published yet.
Cosponsors on this site
Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT), Steve Daines (R-MT), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rick Scott (R-FL), Ron Johnson (R-WI), James E. Risch (R-ID), Mike Crapo (R-ID)
Sponsor's campaign money: Sen. Marshall, Roger [R-KS] reported raising $5.4 million (2025–2026). Details. Shown for context only; it does not mean any donor supported this bill.
Recorded votes
- Senate vote 355 (2022): On the Joint Resolution, SJRES63 (2022-11-15): Joint Resolution Passed
Words on this page, explained (1)
- Joint resolution
- In Texas, the type of measure the Legislature uses to propose a constitutional amendment (marked HJR or SJR). The governor does not sign or veto it; the voters decide. In Congress a joint resolution can also be used like a bill. In Florida, a joint resolution passed by three-fifths of the members of each chamber puts a constitutional amendment on the ballot.
Plain meanings written from linked sources. All words.
Sources
- Congressional Research Service summary (Passed Senate)
- Congress.gov
- Data: GovInfo BILLSTATUS bulk data (Library of Congress), BILLSTATUS-117sjres63.xml <https://www.govinfo.gov/bulkdata/BILLSTATUS/117/sjres>
Record fed-us-cong117-sjres63 · catalog fed-us-congress-bills-cong117 · updated 2026-11-15 by psicol fed-bills-cong117